clickman
I would like to suggest a feature that allows users to create custom mix-point markers within a track.
This would be different from a standard Cue or Hot Cue. The purpose would be to mark a specific point in a song where it can be mixed with another particular track. The user should be able to configure the marker manually and associate it with another song in their library.
For example, I could place a mix-point marker at a specific minute and second in “Take On Me” by a-ha, indicating that this is the ideal moment to start mixing it with “Blinding Lights” by The Weeknd. The corresponding mix point in “Blinding Lights” could also be saved, creating a connection between both tracks.
It would be useful if the marker could store additional information, such as:
* The source track and destination track.
* The exact mix-in and mix-out timestamps.
* Recommended loop length or number of bars.
* BPM or tempo adjustments.
* Key compatibility or suggested key shift.
* Transition type, such as fade, EQ mix, filter, loop, or stem transition.
* Personal notes about how to perform the mix.
* The option to display the marker directly on the waveform.
This feature would make it much easier for DJs to prepare and remember specific transitions between songs, especially when building routines, playlists, or live sets. It would essentially work as a personalized transition map between tracks, rather than just marking an isolated point within one song.
This would be different from a standard Cue or Hot Cue. The purpose would be to mark a specific point in a song where it can be mixed with another particular track. The user should be able to configure the marker manually and associate it with another song in their library.
For example, I could place a mix-point marker at a specific minute and second in “Take On Me” by a-ha, indicating that this is the ideal moment to start mixing it with “Blinding Lights” by The Weeknd. The corresponding mix point in “Blinding Lights” could also be saved, creating a connection between both tracks.
It would be useful if the marker could store additional information, such as:
* The source track and destination track.
* The exact mix-in and mix-out timestamps.
* Recommended loop length or number of bars.
* BPM or tempo adjustments.
* Key compatibility or suggested key shift.
* Transition type, such as fade, EQ mix, filter, loop, or stem transition.
* Personal notes about how to perform the mix.
* The option to display the marker directly on the waveform.
This feature would make it much easier for DJs to prepare and remember specific transitions between songs, especially when building routines, playlists, or live sets. It would essentially work as a personalized transition map between tracks, rather than just marking an isolated point within one song.
Posted 7 hours ago
locoDog
use a marker.
Posted 2 hours ago
PhantomDeejay
Theory is nice.
Reality is brutal.
Under no circumstances a user will use the proposed methodology for more than 10/20 tracks in his entire library.. The amount of work needed for the benefits provided just doesn't justify the time cost.
What users usually do (and they do / can do it already) is to use a simple marker with a quick note.
"SND"" -> "Start Next Deck" (generic, meaning that a nice/clear place for mixing is lying ahead)
"Blind F2" -> "Start Blinding Lights from Hotcue 2" (track specific)
"Loop 8" -> "Loop 8 beats here" (usually used for outro)
e.t.c.
Those quick notes are of course personalized coded information. The examples above are just some that I use personally.
Now add on top that each marker can also be an action POI and you get the picture.
You can do a lot with much less effort.
You don't need specialized info fields. Also, after you have performed a mix between two tracks twice or thrice, you generally remember how to mix them without needing a ton of information.
I'm not against your request, but I just wanted to point out that to me it's too much trouble for nothing, and that you can do more if you look the subject from another perspective.
I record four half hour dj sets every week for a radio show and because of the way the radio station works I have to get a "set approval" prior to the recording.
This means that I have to prepare my mix first and not just do it "on the fly"
So, I prepare the mixes to send them for approval just like it was mentioned above. By using "codified" markers.
However, I find myself most of the time using just a single marker. The "SND" one.. :P
If you know where to mix the "next" song (whichever the song is) then generally if you are an experienced DJ you figure out the rest WAY BEFORE the playback position hits that marker. Without "cheat charts" and "lower pitch at -1,2%, increase key by one semi, start from hotcue 3, loop 4 beats for 6 times and release" instructions written out :P
PS: Don't get me wrong, I'm trying to help!
PS2: Personally I don't use it much (if at all) but you may also want to experiment with Sandbox if it's supported by your sound setup. It allows you to move ahead to the future in case you forgot something about the track that's playing live on air.. :P
Reality is brutal.
Under no circumstances a user will use the proposed methodology for more than 10/20 tracks in his entire library.. The amount of work needed for the benefits provided just doesn't justify the time cost.
What users usually do (and they do / can do it already) is to use a simple marker with a quick note.
"SND"" -> "Start Next Deck" (generic, meaning that a nice/clear place for mixing is lying ahead)
"Blind F2" -> "Start Blinding Lights from Hotcue 2" (track specific)
"Loop 8" -> "Loop 8 beats here" (usually used for outro)
e.t.c.
Those quick notes are of course personalized coded information. The examples above are just some that I use personally.
Now add on top that each marker can also be an action POI and you get the picture.
You can do a lot with much less effort.
You don't need specialized info fields. Also, after you have performed a mix between two tracks twice or thrice, you generally remember how to mix them without needing a ton of information.
I'm not against your request, but I just wanted to point out that to me it's too much trouble for nothing, and that you can do more if you look the subject from another perspective.
I record four half hour dj sets every week for a radio show and because of the way the radio station works I have to get a "set approval" prior to the recording.
This means that I have to prepare my mix first and not just do it "on the fly"
So, I prepare the mixes to send them for approval just like it was mentioned above. By using "codified" markers.
However, I find myself most of the time using just a single marker. The "SND" one.. :P
If you know where to mix the "next" song (whichever the song is) then generally if you are an experienced DJ you figure out the rest WAY BEFORE the playback position hits that marker. Without "cheat charts" and "lower pitch at -1,2%, increase key by one semi, start from hotcue 3, loop 4 beats for 6 times and release" instructions written out :P
PS: Don't get me wrong, I'm trying to help!
PS2: Personally I don't use it much (if at all) but you may also want to experiment with Sandbox if it's supported by your sound setup. It allows you to move ahead to the future in case you forgot something about the track that's playing live on air.. :P
Posted an hour ago